Thursday, October 30, 2008
Easy Come, Easy Go
Sound good? It gets better -- Gaddy will be 17 when he enrolls. Some quick math tells us that he’ll have to spend at least two years at UW before considering pro ball due to the NBA's asinine age limit. [SGB readers are reminded of this old chestnut: "Old enough to fight for your country, old enough to make a crapload of duckets playing pro ball]. I suppose there's a chance he could go all Josh “I have a butler and a free house” Childress on us, but we won't worry about that now.
Some highlights (cruelly, put together by some site called GoAZCats.com):
Finally, while we're tangentially on the subject of Lute Olson, I feel compelled to impart this nifty anecdote from the March 2006 issue of Wine Spectator:
“[My wife and I] went to Joseph Phelps after we made the Final Four in 1988, which was the first time any Arizona team had ever been rated No. 1. The fellow who met us was a U-of-A grad, and a big fan. He looked at my Final Four watch and said, "Would you consider trading it for a case of '84 Insignia?" I had about a dozen of those watches in the drawer at home, so I agreed. He sent us a case of '84 Insignia, signed by the winemaker. My wife and I went out of town the weekend the wine came. We arrived home Sunday night, and as we were walking by the trashcan on the way into the house, we saw bottle after bottle of Insignia. One of our sons had had a party at the house. And they could have been drinking Boone's Farm, for all it mattered to them. Easy come, easy go.”
Um, I woulda whupped that kid’s ass. Just saying.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Breaking up is hard to do....
They tipped off tonight in their new ugly uniforms with their new ugly fans. Whenever I feel overcome with sadness, I find it helpful to put together a list of things I don't miss.
- Earl Watson - Stop me Sonics fans if this line looks familiar. 3/9, 8 pts, 4 assists and the team was a minus 16 with the "Pearl" on the floor.
- Bad losses - In front of what was undoubtedly a sell-out crowd, the TFKATSS (squint your eyes and that looks like fat-ass) lost to a Milwaukee team playing a second night in a row. Not only did they lose, they scored 14 points in the first quarter and were down 15 at halftime. PJ, the master motivator, strikes again.
- Helping to pad the other team's stats - I remember watching Raymond Felton play against the Sonics last year and this usually mediocre guy looked like an All-Star. Absolutely unstoppable. He dropped 23 and 6 and hit the game-winning shot. Tonight's Raymond Felton? Charlie Villanueva, who dropped 20 and 12. (He averaged 12 and 6 last year.)
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Know Hope
Jack the GM is not a whiz kid. He's not a candidate to be the subject of Michael Lewis's next book. He's a baseball lifer. I think that's good. The Mariners didn't just hire the first Theo Epstein facsimile they could find. They apparently hired the guy they liked, which shows some fortitude.
Jack the GM has three things going for him.
First, he's not Bill Bavasi.
Second, he's proven over the years that he knows how to draft. He drafted half the current Brewers, and that's a hell of a good-looking young team. Moreover, the papers are reporting that he'll bring two of his Brewers colleagues with him to start rebuilding the Mariners scouting operation. If the M's start drafting like the Brewers, that's a huge leap forward. No offense, Matts Clement and Tuiasosopo.
Third, he's starting to clean house. He must have sent a pretty clear message to Jim Riggelman that he's looking for a new manager, because Riggelman signed on to be the Nats' bench coach. (Bizarrely, Riggelman told reporters the day he took the job that he is "still holding out hope that I could go back to Seattle.") And today he fired Bob Fontaine, the longtime director of scouting. So if you ask me whether Jack the GM knows he has to start over, I'd say that signs point to yes.
I do have one concern. At his press conference, Jack the GM let the meaningless baseball cliches fly without any traces of self-awareness. Here's what I want to know: Do the dumb cliches just seem correlated to losing because most GM's say stupid shit and most GM's do stupid shit? Or are they in fact correlated? Does the stupid shit they say explain the stupid shit they're about to do? Time will tell, and I plan to monitor the situation closely.
So here's what Jack the GM gave us to start out with.
"My goal," he said, "is the build this organization into position to compete with the best clubs in baseball."
Then: "My goal would be to put the best club on the field that we possibly can by the time Spring Training opens and then into the first game of the season."
Then: "Our goal is to win as quickly as possible and sooner than later would be better."
Then: "My goal is to create a team. I can tell you sincerely that when this thing is said and done, we're going to be a team from top to bottom."
I am glad that Jack the GM isn't trying to put the worst club on the field over the long term so that this collection of selfish individuals is in a position to continue losing. I'm glad that they'll all be "pulling from the same end of the rope," because God knows you can't win when half of you are pulling from the other end of the rope.
Straight Talk, Expressed
Brown: So are you going to run for governor?
Barkley: I plan on it in 2014.
Brown: You are serious.
Barkley: I am, I can't screw up Alabama.
Brown: There is no place to go but up in your view?
Barkley: We are number 48 in everything and Arkansas and Mississippi aren't going anywhere.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Bye Ty
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Seattle: "We're #1 (Among Places to Live)!"
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Dog Bites Man: P-I Edition
Let's see. The guy who's gone 26–17 chooses not to seek coaching advice from the guy who's gone 11–31. Stop the presses, Joe, I've got a hot one!...[T]he current leader of the Irish doesn't spend time exchanging small talk or inside secrets with the man he replaced at Notre Dame in 2005.
Weis, whose team invades Husky Stadium on Saturday for a 5 p.m. battle, said Tuesday he is cordial with Willingham and talked to him in January at the national coaches convention, but the two are not exactly on speed dial or each other's Fave Five phone lists.
Carlesimo adds naive optimism to legendary ineptitude

Kevin: "Do you think he’s a midget?"
Jeff: "No way, he’s a kid. Look at the size of his head… it’s well-proportioned."
Kevin: "So he’s some kind of breakdancing prodigy?"
Jeff: "Well, he’s good, but I wouldn’t call him a… what’s that coach? Ok, inbound to Earl, let him dribble down the clock and take a fade away three? Got it… BREAK!"
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Open casting call for Mariners GM
According to the SeattleTimes:
The team's list has been reduced to Kim Ng, assistant GM of the Dodgers; Jerry DiPoto, director of player personnel for the Diamondbacks; Tony LaCava, assistant GM of the Blue Jays; and Jack Zduriencik, the Brewers' VP for player personnel.Not a peep from the team. They've dragged their feet for so long that they might not be able to announce a new GM until the end of the World Series, due to Major League Baseball's rules against making news during the Fall Classic.
What awaits the new GM?
1) A new manager - A new GM will want their own manager not some leftover from the previous failed administration. Best to get cracking before all the good candidates are elsewhere.
2) Beltre - He's in the last year of his deal. He still has SOME value and a new GM may look to deal him for a few prospects.
3) Raul - Do you break the bank to try to resign him in the free agency market? I say no. I love Raul. He's a good player and a good guy, but he's 36 and this team needs to get younger.
4) Bedard - Do you offer him arbitration? I think yes. Sure, he was a total stinker last year, but he is due for free agency after next season, which means he will AT LEAST try.
That's only four major decisions, but please take your time, think it over, and let us know whenever the time is right. In the meantime, I will bleed to death from a thousand paper cuts.
UPDATE - The Associated Press is now reporting that the Mariners have selected Milwaukee Brewers executive Jack Zduriencik as their new general manager. Here's the write-up from when he was named Baseball America Executive of the Year in 2007.
Monday, October 20, 2008
A Visit to a Magical Place

It's not that it was a mistake to visit Austin; it was a mistake not to have gone there earlier and more often. For SGB staffers who went to small Northeastern schools, the difference between UT campus life and our college experiences is like the difference between shooting a bullet and throwing a bullet. We hit bars and restaurants that kept raising the bar, so to speak. We saw dozens of students camped out at 3:30AM waiting for ESPN College Gameday to dawn. And we were a few of 98,000 fans screaming our support for UT over Missouri, even though the Longhorns didn't need our help. Texas' 56-31 win over Mizzou wasn't even that close and quarterback Colt McCoy completed a ridiculous 91% of his passes. UT strengthened its hold on the top ranking in a place that feels like the center of the universe.
As great as the Austin trip was, it's still nice to return to Seattle, a place that orbits in the same firmament of cool cities as Texas' capital. But of course we come back to a sporting scene as bleak as our October skies. It's even more disheartening because it didn't used to be this way, at least on the collegiate level. At halftime of UW's loss to Oregon State, Washington honored its 1978 Rose Bowl team, reminding fans of better days. During the Don James era, UW probably looked a lot like UT does now, minus the beautiful weather and even more beautiful coeds. Now the Huskies are 0-6 and the vultures circling over Ty Willingham's head are flying lower every week.
It's easy to forget how much excitement and pride a winning team brings to your town when you experience nothing but losing -- losing games and losing teams -- like Seattle has recently. Of course Texas will always have more rabid football fans than the Northwest. But if or when UW returns to gridiron prominence, think how much support the team will get from the school and community, even though it's not the only game in town. It would, however, be the only winning game in town.
Austin probably feels different when the Longhorns aren't winning, although I don't know when that would be. Seattle's self-worth isn't as tied into the performance of its teams as other places, but it's easy to de-emphasize sports when you're losing. We can pretend we don't care, but we're really just trying to control our anger. Yes, mistakes were made, but at least some of them can be undone.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Coach Is It
I can't answer these questions, but I can offer a few thoughts about what a coach or a manager might do for a team. I invite readers to comment away.
A good coach:
1. Is a brilliant tactician, calling the right plays from minute to minute. Put on the hit and run. Call V-54 Right (hut hut).
2. Is a strategic savant, pointing his team in the right general direction, given the personnel. We rely on the bullpen and the top of the order. We can use our special teams to great advantage.
3. Is a cheerleader extraordinaire who knows how to manipulate his players' psyches and make a winner. Reggie Jackson is Mr. October, but Billy Martin is Mr. October's puppet master.
4. (In college) is a wizard at recruiting, getting the best guys to sign on to the program. Adrian Peterson is Adrian Peterson. Bob Stoopes could be Bozo the Clown and it wouldn't matter.
5. Is a solid manager of a staff, hiring and nurturing the right underlings who can design defenses and offenses. Mike Martz is the reason SF isn't winless. (OK, that's weak, but this list is exhaustive, theoretically).
6. Is a great teacher who maximizes the talent he has access to by making each player learn how to maximize his own talent. It's spring training. Joe Torre makes sure Furcal knows how to manage a rundown.
Those are six I've come up with. But what do you think? Why is a good coach good? And, given a good coach, what difference does it make? Terry Francona is a bad manager. Everybody knows it. But his teams win. So is he actually a good manager, or is he lucky? Phil Jackson has won in two cities. But he's had the best players. Does he get credit for keeping the Lakers together, or does he get the blame for letting them fall apart?
Sound off.
Reefer of the Day
"The Seahawks unlucky history with 1-4 starts."
Evidently, when the Seahawks start 1-4, they don't fare well. Note that.
Shaun of the Red
"When Ladell Betts went down, we went looking for a guy who would hit the hole nice and slow, and who would fall down at the first hint of contact. We got our man in Shaun Alexander," head coach Jim Zorn did not say in a statement. "We signed Ryan because, when it comes to punting, we figure: If 22 yards per attempt is good enough for P-for-K, it's good enough for us," he did not add.
Monday, October 13, 2008
The Other Garfield
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Colt Who?

Friday, October 10, 2008
Dog Bites Man
The defense was very good today, the secondary making a number of plays, including interceptions by Deon Grant and Wilson.Mike Holmgren thinks it's a good sign that the Seahawks' first-string defense was able to intercept two passes thrown by their second-string, or possibly by their third-string, quarterback.
Um, wouldn't it be news if they couldn't?
Cold comfort
Q: I just saw a link on ESPN.com talking about the Lakers' first preseason game. So, I clicked the NBA link at the top of ESPN.com to see how my Sonics did in their first preseason game, meaningless as it might be. And then I remembered. This was my first "It Just Sank In" moment as a Sonics fan. I'm going to rummage through my cupboards for some scotch now.-- Jack, Seattle
SG: Here's my contribution to the poor Sonics fans: You know the team Kevin Durant plays for right now? I'm never mentioning their "new" name in this column. Ever. For as long as I have it. I'm alternating between these four names …
1. Kevin Durant's Team.
2. The Seattle SloppySeconds
3. The Bennett City Hijackers
4. The Team That Shall Not Be Named
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Seriously?
The start of the NBA preseason is re-opening a lot of old wounds about the Sonics. And I'm bitter. Quick lesson, Oklahoma City. Part of the responsibility of having a real NBA team is to have real reporters following the team who know what they are talking about. After reading this blog post, I think we might need to step in and revoke some press credentials.
Here's some of the high (or low) lights from Mike Sherman, "sports editor":
"Remember all the folks who told us Oklahoma City was delusional to think it was getting an NBA team? Remember those who laughed when we thought the Hornets might stay? Remember when we were told that Mr. Microsoft, Mr. Coffee and Slade Gorton and all those superior intellects, millionaires and “revealing emails” were going to force Clay Bennett’s group to sell the team?"Wait - did I miss something? Last I checked, it was the NEW ORLEANS Hornets.
"Loved the road unis. LOVE THEM. The look like the New York Knicks’ roadies and that’s a good thing. The “Oklahoma City” on the front might be crowded, but hey, you’ve got to fly the flag. I heard some folks say the “OKC” would have looked better. I might have even been one of them. If I was, I was wrong.Spelling it out is a political statement. This team is representing the city and the taxpayers who made its presence here possible. And the ownership group is broadcasting that to the world and every NBA city the Thunder visits by wearing “Oklahoma City” across the franchise’s chest. It’s a sign of appreciation, respect and gratitude. Good call, Clay."
The first thing you point out is the uniform? Seriously? And is this guy serious that spelling out the city's full name is a sign of respect? Hold on, I am too busy stabbing myself in the eye ball.
"These guys won’t be the Phoenix Suns, but I’ve got a hunch that they’re more suited to a fast-paced, open-court style of play ... There was a concern about Westbrook’s natural playmaking skills at point guard and those skills are less important in the open court."By that logic, Steve Nash's "playmaking" skills are not that important because Phoenix plays in an up-tempo system. Good point guard skills are even more paramount in an up-tempo system. All the really good up-tempo teams in the NBA have a good PG with "playmaking" skills. And the bad ones are still searching. See: Denver Nuggets.
"Some of my colleagues at The Oklahoman say we should leave it up to the Thunder coaches and GM Sam Presti to decide who starts. Clay Bennett agrees with them because he hired those guys and not me, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t offer opinions and observations."First Amendment scholars everywhere rejoice.
"My interest in the NBA is, of course, greater than my expertise in it. But watching these games is a great way for all of us to learn. And no matter how complicated some try to make it, if we watch the game, and keep our mind and ears open, we all can learn a lot quickly."I'll leave the lack of expertise comment alone since I think that point is pretty self-evident. What's with the rah-rah 'let's learn together' routine?
"My eyes tell me Russell Westbrook is going to be a ballplayer."This is about the only thing in his post that I can agree with --- because SGB made that point nearly five months ago.
Looking ahead

Would I find it in Pullman, of all places?
Um, no... I wouldn’t. But what the hell else can I write about?
You may remember last year, when the Cougs rode the talented Kyle Weaver (now a member of the Oklahoma City Thunder -- et tu, Kyle?) to 26 wins. Their season ended in the Sweet 16 to eventual runner-up UNC. Weaver, Derrick Low and Robbie "2.5 personal fouls per game" Cowgill all graduated, leaving the Cougs in a rebuilding year. Next year, they will dress 10 freshman.
So what’s there to look forward to? A 229 pound unpolished block machine that goes by the name of DeAngelo Casto, that's what.
Casto, a Spokane native, briefly flirted with UW before signing with Wazzou. The 6’8 power forward plays an angry brand of basketball. He ushered Ferris High through back-to-back undefeated seasons, leaving the team with a 58 game winning streak and two consecutive 4A championships. In the 4A tournament, he averaged 19.7 points and he broke a record by tallying 25 blocks in four games (including eight in the championship game). He single-handedly doused the storied Spokane barn fire of 2005, helped an average of 3.2 old ladies cross the street over his freshman and sophomore seasons and convinced Senator Cantwell to vote against the bailout bill, calling the bill a "band-aid." Said Casto, "H.R. 1424 is no panacea, and our government has approved it in a dispiritingly desultory manner." He also can eat 29 eggs in one sitting. [Ed. Note: We're fairly certain none of this is true. Except for the egg bit.]
Bring on college basketball season. Or more to the point, bring on the end of the Seahawks' season.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Hindsight is 50/50
In this morning's Times, Steve Kelley put the city's existential football crisis to rest by answering the question we've all been asking: "WHY?" The answer: Jim Zorn.
If Jesus is the reason for the season, then Zorn, the Seahawks' former quarterback and quarterback coach, is clearly the reason for the Redskins' 4-1 record (against tough divison rivals on the road, no less).
According to this mangled, short-bus-style associative property, Zorn coaches the Skins, the Skins are 4-1, so if Zorn coached the Hawks, we'd be 4-1.
In particular, Kelley says, Hasselbeck "hasn't been the same without Zorn." Welcome to the concept of the spurious relationship. Hasselbeck hasn't been the same without Zorn, it's true, but the confounding factor or lurking variable is named Bobby Engram, Deion Branch, and Nate Burleson.
You cannot seriously lay Hasselbeck's suckitude at the feet of the changing quarterback coaching regime. You also cannot seriously credit Zorn with all the success of what was, after all, a playoff team last year. Clinton Portis deserves some of the credit. So does Santana Moss. So does Jason Campbell (though you could argue from the back of the short bus that Campbell's good year so far is all about Zorn).
Zorn may be a decent head coach. Or he may not be. It is not certain. What is beyond certain is that if Jim Zorn were coaching the Seahawks right now, we'd be 1-4.
Early retirement for Holmgren?
This is not the farewell tour that Mike Holmgren had planned. He's not getting rocking chairs or golf clubs in every city and his reputation as a offensive "genius" is taking a hit with every pathetic showing by the Seahawks. There is no shortage of excuses. Hasselbeck is hurt and the team's WRs are banged up. But those injuries don't explain how uninspired the team looks. It doesn't explain how every team except for the St. Louis Rams has been more physical and better prepared than the Seahawks. (Cue: fake punt from Buffalo.)
The only conclusion we can draw is that it is time for Mike to step down. Now. In one of his rare posts, Yuniesky rightfully pointed out how strange the Jim Mora transition plan is and how it actually hurts the team. It's clear that the players are already tuning out Holmgren who will play no role in helping them get a contract extension or even determine their role for next year. The succession plan has effectively removed both the carrot and the stick.
Of course, this will never happen. In the minds of Seattle sports fans, Holmgren ranks right up there with Lou Pinella, another fiery Seattle manager whose regular season success never translated into playoff victories. The situation has gotten so bad that Seattle's elite sports media (we read all media here at SGB) has taken to calling Jim Zorn - the coach who got away. Jim Zorn is probably not the answer and the jury is still out on Jim Mora, but one thing we know for sure is that Mike Holmgren is definitely NOT the answer. Later Mike, see you in two years with the New York Jets.
Monday, October 6, 2008
Seahawks Crashing
The crushing 44-6 loss to the Giants was all-encompassing. New York outgained Seattle 523-187, the defense missed tackles and looked generally meek, and the offense couldn't do anything. The Dice Game called this one: the Seahawks, in a crucial contest they had two weeks to prepare for, wilted early and often.
Holmgren is saying things like, "This is the same group of guys we had last year. We just played badly," and "We'll keep doing the things we've doing." Really? Playing matador defense and not protecting the QB are what you're going to keep doing? News conferences are notorious for being bland, but Holmgren's platitudes indicate either a delusion that the Seahawks can just turn it on (unlikely) or a lack of answers to what's wrong here (more likely).
The Hawks can't rely on coasting to a title in the NFL's worst division any more. They now look like the third-best team in the NFC West. The Cardinals crushed the previously-undefeated Bills and the 49ers were game against the Patriots, and they've already beaten the Seahawks here. This is a dead team walking. Luckily, the Seattle Mist start play in less than a year.
An SGB Challenge
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Questions after the first quarter
2) Where are their unvaunted d-backs? Toomer's just playing catch with Manning.
3) Why wasn't Deion Branch looking for that touchdown pass that hit him in the head?
It's starting to look like the answers all add up to a Giants blowout.
Friday, October 3, 2008
A New Game in Town

Thursday, October 2, 2008
I Wish I Could Quit You

I think it's all of those reasons. The problem is, you don't see the most important reason why we should root for a head coach: he's a good coach that gives us a chance to win.
The numbers just aren't on his side. Over his head coaching career, he is 76-80-1. He's had only 6 winning seasons since 1995 (including Notre Dame's epic 6-5 2004 season). His record at Washington? 11-29. yikes.
We pretend to care, but we'd take a Pac-10 title for a few broken rules. Hell, we'd take a bowl game for a few years of probation -- all we have to do is muster 6 freaking wins.
The loss to Stanford was as unforgivable as it was embarrassing. Locker's thumb had nothing to do with Stanford's 466 yards of offense. I'm not calling for his ouster (because that's for reactionary assholes), but I am officially no longer rooting for him.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Nut check time for the Seahawks
The Giants are everything the Seahawks are not. They have an identity: aggressive, ball-hawking defense and a powerful offensive line that blows open holes for a variety of different-sized backs. They are tough, smart and nasty.
Yes, the Seahawks wide receiver corps have been decimated by injuries, but the bigger problem existed even before the injuries. This team has absolutely no identity. It was supposed to be the defense, but the vaunted D gave up 34 points to Buffalo in the season opener and a more embarrassing 33 to San Francisco at home. The Seahawks are full of nice guys, but it is painfully obvious that they lack a toughness that all great teams have. As Oscar Pendejo pointed out in July, this team needs some attitude. (As a rule of thumb, guys in jail are tough.)
Some fans may feel a little better about the team, because it whipped up on St. Louis two weeks ago. But the reality is that the Rams wouldn't be able make it to a bowl game if they were playing on Saturdays and talk of an improved running game is predicated on pounding the ball against the porous Rams and 49ers defenses. Against Buffalo's legitimate defense, the team ran for 84 yards.
I really expect this team to fold like a lawn chair against the Giants who will ram the ball down the Seahawks throat (especially with Plaxico Burress suspended). Pure and simple, this game is a nut check for the Hawks. If they don't sack up, the year of discontent for Seattle sports will just extend into the winter.